Business
USVI Receives $62.5 Million Settlement from Leon Black Amid Epstein Investigations

Earlier in January 2021, the U.S. Virgin Islands government presented a subpoena to Black. The document sought comprehensive communication records between Black and Epstein, and his inner circle, dating back to 1998. Additionally, they requested details pertaining to Black’s visits to Epstein’s private haven, Little St. James. Confirmations suggest that Black responded to this subpoena with the settlement amount within the same month.
Black’s representatives have since come forward to shed light on the situation. According to them, the settlement in question doesn’t imply Black’s awareness of or involvement in Epstein’s nefarious activities. The stance remains that Black was neither complicit nor informed about Epstein’s misconduct.
The intricate association between Black and Epstein has been the epicenter of legal debates and public speculation. Black reportedly transferred $158 million to Epstein between 2012 and 2017. This timeframe is significant as it followed Epstein’s criminal conviction for soliciting minors in Palm Beach. However, Black has consistently maintained that these transactions were for legitimate estate planning and tax advisory services, albeit admitting that Epstein’s guidance wasn’t on par with top-tier professionals.
Currently, the Senate Finance Committee is scrutinizing the legitimacy of the payments Black made to Epstein. It’s worth mentioning that Black distanced himself from Apollo in 2021, subsequent to revelations regarding his ties to Epstein coming to the forefront.
The financial turbulence for Black doesn’t end with the U.S. Virgin Islands’ settlement. Legal challenges continue to surround him due to his association with Epstein. A notable lawsuit has been filed by Cheri Pierson. Furthermore, a recent lawsuit in Manhattan’s federal court alleges misconduct by Black in 2002. Black’s legal team has categorically rejected such claims, asserting a complete lack of acquaintance with the accuser.
Interestingly, this isn’t the U.S. Virgin Islands’ first significant financial settlement related to Epstein. The territory previously secured a whopping $105 million from Epstein’s estate. Presently, the islands’ legal team is gearing up for a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, seeking damages estimated at a minimum of $190 million. The bank is being accused of facilitating Epstein’s illicit activities, most notably the alleged transfer of over $1.1 million to women and girls post his client relationship termination.
JPMorgan Chase, while acknowledging Epstein as a high-profile client from 1998 to 2013, has refuted any knowledge of his wrongdoings.
These unfolding legal sagas revolving around Epstein-affiliated entities emphasize the lasting impact and continuing investigations into the dealings of the late financier. It’s essential to note that Ghislaine Maxwell, closely associated with Epstein, is currently serving a 20-year prison term due to her involvement in the sex trafficking network.
Business
Updates to VI Slice Home Loan Standards Aims to Revive Dormant Program

In a recent move to revitalize a stagnant program and promote homeownership in the U.S. Virgin Islands, the V.I. Economic Development Authority (EDA) revealed a set of revised criteria for the VI Slice Moderate-Income Homeownership Program, popularly known as VI Slice.
These newly instated changes, which take effect immediately, were introduced to serve a broader segment of the local community, thereby fueling economic momentum through an uptick in lending activities for those aspiring to own homes in the region. In the past, various bureaucratic hurdles and inefficiencies held the program back, dissuading many potential homeowners.
Addressing these issues in the EDA’s announcement, they highlighted a significant shift in the maximum combined loan-to-value (CLTV) ratio, which saw an increase from 95% to a more lenient 105%. Additionally, the debt-to-income ratio (DTI) was adjusted upwards from 31% to 36%. This decisive action was a direct response to the feedback the Economic Development Bank (EDB), an affiliate of the EDA, received from the mortgage lenders regarding the previous VI Slice CLTV and DTI benchmarks.
EDA’s Chief Executive Officer, Wayne L. Biggs, Jr., elucidated the rationale behind these modifications. He noted that the initial metrics imposed a cap on the financing lenders could extend to their clients. More crucially, these figures were misaligned with the stipulations set for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans. Therefore, the newly adjusted ratios mirror industry standards, paving the way for a greater number of residents to reap the benefits of the program.
To provide some clarity around the CLTV ratio: it is a metric that juxtaposes the total sum borrowed for a home relative to the property’s actual valuation. For instance, if a $100,000 home is eyed, with a primary mortgage of $80,000 and a supplementary loan of $10,000, then the total borrowed amount stands at $90,000. By dividing this sum by the home’s price, we get a CLTV ratio of 90%. This percentage offers lenders insights into the potential risks involved in granting a loan, with a higher ratio indicating elevated risk levels.
In light of these changes, the Economic Development Bank is now urging all lenders bound by a VI Slice Memorandum of Agreement with the EDA to re-examine and forward cases that didn’t qualify under the prior CLTV and DTI guidelines.
As of a recent update in October 2022, the VI Slice initiative is co-managed by the EDA, working closely with both the Office of the Governor and the Office of Disaster Recovery.
To delve deeper into the enhancements introduced to the VI Slice initiative, stakeholders and interested individuals are encouraged to reach out via email at [email protected] or explore their official website at www.vislice.com.
Business
Territorial Draft on Cannabis Regulations Revealed: Limits Set at 2 Ounces for Non-Medical Use

In a much-anticipated move, the Office of Cannabis Regulation (OCR) has released draft regulations detailing the prospective framework for the territory’s budding cannabis sector. This comprehensive 144-page document offers insights ranging from the foundational structure and responsibilities of the OCR to the procedural dynamics of acquiring different cannabis licenses.
For non-medical adult users, the draft proposes a possession limit of 2 ounces of cannabis. Furthermore, it defines limits on cannabis concentrates at 14 grams, with one ounce dedicated to other related cannabis products. In contrast, medical patients, after obtaining the necessary registration and qualifications, could be permitted to possess up to 4 ounces of cannabis, an ounce of concentrates, or 2 ounces of other specified products.
The draft doesn’t just stop at setting possession thresholds. It also presents an intricate licensing framework, encapsulating diverse cannabis operations:
- Cultivation Licenses: This license permits operations like cannabis growing, curing, processing, internal testing, storage, packaging, and labeling. Additionally, it allows the transportation and transfer of cannabis items between different cannabis enterprises and testing hubs on the same island. A maximum of 1000 flowering plants and a range of 3,000-4,000 immature plants is permissible under this license.
- Manufacturing Licenses: Those holding this license cannot grow the cannabis plant. However, they are permitted to manufacture, process, test, package, label, and transport cannabis products within the confines of the same island.
- Dispensary Licenses: Dedicated solely for medical cannabis users.
- Research & Development Licenses: Catering to the scientific community, this license allows for the evaluation and product evolution of cannabis items.
- Testing Licenses: This specific regime caters to businesses aiming to validate the efficacy and quality of cannabis products.
Recognizing the need to protect small-scale local cultivators, the draft introduces a special micro-cultivation permit. This allows individuals to grow under 50 flowering and 200 immature cannabis plants. The catch? They must offload their products to licensed cultivators. Furthermore, manufacturers and dispensaries must ensure that at least 15% of their inventory originates from these micro-cultivators.
For recreational enthusiasts, the draft proposes designated consumption zones. These spaces, clearly marked and accessible only to those above 21, will be dedicated to cannabis consumption. Importantly, direct sales in these zones won’t be permissible.
It’s pivotal to understand that this draft is preliminary. Emphasized on every page is the clarification that legal thoroughness is yet to be achieved, and reviews by the Cannabis Advisory Board or the Office of Cannabis Regulations are still pending. The OCR encourages the public to read, interpret, and provide feedback on the draft. Feedback can be sent to [email protected] until 5:00 p.m. on October 10. This feedback will be instrumental in refining the document before its final rendition is officially released.
Until the final guidelines are sanctioned and brought into action by the Office of Cannabis Regulations, it remains imperative for residents to remember that the sale, consumption, and cultivation of marijuana and its derivatives are still prohibited in the territory.
Business
USVI’s PFA Board Adopts “Situational” Remote Work Guidelines, Reflecting Changing Employment Dynamics

The debate over a mandatory return to on-site work has become a central topic nationwide, emphasizing an evolving employment milieu since the widespread closures of educational institutions, corporate hubs, and commercial establishments more than three years back. In response to this shift, several employers have either introduced incentives to encourage in-person attendance or have issued ultimatums to achieve the same.
Recently, during the board meeting of the Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority (PFA), the conversation centered around the nuances of telecommuting. Lorelei Farrington, the PFA Staff Counsel, presented a revamped personnel manual which highlighted that remote work for PFA personnel will be evaluated “situationally.”
Detailing the criteria, Ms. Farrington mentioned, “An array of factors come into play. An employee’s historical and ongoing performance, punctuality, reliability, integrity, proficiency in communication, autonomy in work, overall productivity, and an aptitude to prioritize tasks and adhere to deadlines are some of them.”
In addressing the board’s inquiries, Farrington elaborated that the feasibility of remote work hinges on an individual’s specific role and responsibilities. She emphasized the need for a signed agreement to define the particulars of telecommuting, with the terms being mutually agreed upon by both the employee and their supervisor. PFA’s Director of Finance and Administration, Nathan Simmonds, added that certain positions might be entirely remote, while others would necessitate partial or complete in-office presence.
Given the imminent expansion of PFA’s team, from 35 to a projected 100 (as Disaster Recovery staff from the CDBG program transition), Farrington asserted the timeliness of implementing a well-thought-out remote work policy.
However, Board Member Dorothy Isaacs voiced concerns about potential disparities in policy application potentially affecting morale. “A scenario where one employee primarily telecommutes while another is regularly on-site could cause friction,” Isaacs stated, advocating for a standardized minimum of two in-office days for all staff members. She underscored the challenges in preserving team dynamics with scattered physical presence, predicting potential pitfalls.
On the other hand, Simmonds pointed out the current limitations in office space. He advocated for the value of remote work in aiding organizational expansion without immediate infrastructural investments. He emphasized, “If a role is seamlessly executable remotely, why shouldn’t we leverage that flexibility?” Simmonds was quick to remind that telecommuting is a privilege, not a right, but highlighted the importance of maintaining an adaptable approach.
The concluding sentiments reflected global corporate sentiments on the matter, weighing the pros and cons of remote work. After thorough deliberation, the PFA board unanimously agreed to incorporate the remote work policy in the latest employee handbook. Additionally, an updated maternity leave guideline, aligned with recent federal mandates, also received the board’s nod.
-
Education1 month ago
CTE Board Enthusiastic About New Curriculum Standards, Yet Anxious Over Apprenticeship Support
-
Crime1 month ago
Registered Sex Offender Detained for Illegal Firearm Possession During Annual Surveillance Drive
-
Crime1 month ago
Unraveling the Home Invasion in St. John: Suspect Held on $100,000 Bail
-
Crime1 month ago
U.S. Virgin Islands Alert: Megan Smith Goes Missing; Authorities Request Community Aid
-
Accidents1 month ago
Tragic Collision on Queen Mary Highway: VIPD Reveals Victim’s Identity
-
Sports2 months ago
Natalie Kleemann-Day: Virgin Islands’ Pride and Future in Women’s Basketball
-
Health1 month ago
USVI Launches Advanced System for Improved Patient Evacuation Management
-
Government1 month ago
VIPA Denies Obstructing Charlotte Amalie Harbor Dredging, Cites Budget Limitations