Variety image for Russell Brand Takes the Stand in Rape Trial and Reveals No One Agreed to Testify on His Behalf: ‘My Entire Life Has Been Consumed by These Allegations’ - Variety

🎬 Entertainment · Variety

Russell Brand Takes the Stand in Rape Trial and Reveals No One Agreed to Testify on His Behalf: ‘My Entire Life Has Been Consumed by These Allegations’ - Variety

From Variety via USVI News: Russell Brand took the stand in his criminal trial, denying all accusations against him and revealing that no one else will testify on his behalf.

USVInews.com User Network Contributor

- U.S.

- Asia

- Global

Josh O’Connor Is a Reluctant Boxer in First-Look Clip of National Theatre Live’s ‘Golden Boy’ Ahead of Cinema Release (EXCLUSIVE)

Russell Brand Takes the Stand in Rape Trial and Reveals No One Agreed to Testify on His Behalf: ‘My Entire Life Has Been Consumed by These Allegations’

Amelia Dimoldenberg’s Final ‘Chicken Shop Date’ Series to Screen in Theaters

Russell Brand took the stand in his criminal trial in London on Wednesday, denying all accusations against him and revealing that he was not able to convince anyone to testify on his behalf.

He was called by his lawyer, Ian Winter KC, as the first and only witness as his defense began to lay out its case, according to Sky News. Winter began by asking Brand if he had committed each of the alleged offenses he is being accused of, to which he repeatedly replied: “No.” Questioned about his prominence in the mid-2000s, Brand said that his marriage to Katy Perry in 2010 brought about “staggering fame.”

Video-Game Rating Group ESRB Names Netflix and MPA Alum Orit Michiel President

Barbara Barrie, Oscar-Nominated Star of ‘Barney Miller’ and ‘Breaking Away,’ Dies at 95

Brand then revealed that not a single person with relevant information agreed to testify on his behalf in the trial. “My entire life has been consumed by these allegations,” he told the Southwark Crown Court. “I have devoted myself to these matters.”

He called the 2023 Channel 4 documentary about him “devastating” and claimed that he was not able to visit his sick son in the hospital because he had been publicly accused of rape. “The reason given by Great Ormond Street Hospital when my son was receiving open heart surgery and subsequent treatment was due to the material published,” he said, according to Sky News.

On Tuesday, judge Mr Justice Bennathan reduced one of Brand’s seven charges from indecent assault to attempted indecent assault, telling jurors that there was “insufficient evidence” regarding an alleged 2001 incident involving a MTV employee. He has also been charged with three counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault, and has pleaded not guilty to all charges. The case involves six female plaintiffs, all of whom are given automatic lifelong anonymity according to U.K. law, and relates to alleged offenses that occurred between 1999 and 2009.

Outside the courthouse on Wednesday, Brand told journalists (via Sky News): “Due to the circumstances of today, I think it would be inappropriate for me to say anything other than I am very grateful that today’s a day for truth and justice and we are blessed that as yet we have a system that can accommodate such things.” He was accompanied by his wife, Laura Gallacher.

On the stand, Brand was then questioned by the defense about the first allegation, concerning a woman who alleged he raped her at the 1999 Labour party conference. After meeting at his cabaret show, Brand said the woman “suggested we go to her hotel room” and he thought there may be a “possibility of sex.” In the room, he said there was “messing about, some kissing on the body and sex with a condom.” Asked about her claim that he forced her to take the photos, Brand responded: “I don’t know how you can make someone take photographs.” Further questioned on the importance of consent, he said, “Consent is a fundamental, essential and necessary, and in many ways more important than sex itself.”

Moving on to the second accusation, involving a woman who claims Brand grabbed her and tried to pull her into a toilet while she was working at MTV in 2001, Brand said he has no recollection of the alleged incident. Regarding the third complainant, who alleged Brand squeezed her breasts at a party in Soho in 2004 and then orally raped her in a toilet, he said he was introduced to her by the host of the party as a “bird” who “really wants to meet you.” He said he “absolutely” did not grab her breasts and said the toilet she claimed he orally raped her in “was unsuitable for me to meet the goal… of getting it off.” He also denied the fourth woman’s allegation, who claimed he allegedly pushed her against a wall and “aggressively” kissed her while she was working at Capital Radio in 2004/2005.

This article is republished through the USVI News affiliate desk. Reporting, analysis, and viewpoints are those of the original publisher and do not necessarily reflect USVI News.

Read more at Variety