Oldest octopus fossil found to not be an octopus - Ars Technica

Pohlsepia mazonensis, a visually underwhelming fossil from Illinois, fundamentally broke our understanding of cephalopod evolution. Described in 2000 and hailed as the oldest known octopus in the fossil record, the specimen dated back to the late Carboniferous period, roughly 311 to 306 million years ago. Pohlsepia was an outlier—all other fossil records strongly suggested that crown coleoids, the group containing octopuses, squid, and cuttlefish, diverged much later, during the Jurassic.

To solve this puzzle, Thomas Clements, a paleontologist at the University of Leicester, and his colleagues put this supposed oldest octopus fossil through a series of high-tech imaging tests. They found Pohlsepia was not an octopus at all. Instead, it was a decomposed, squashed nautiloid.

The reason a nautiloid managed to masquerade as an octopus for almost a quarter of a century was due to the way that fossils from the Mazon Creek Lagerstätte formed. Around 300 million years ago, this area was a brackish, tidal marine basin that was periodically inundated by massive amounts of iron-rich river mud. When organisms died and were buried in this sediment fan, the high iron content triggered the precipitation of the mineral siderite around their decaying bodies, locking them inside hard geological nodules.

This process can preserve soft tissues, but it doesn’t turn the dead animals into three-dimensional statues. Instead, the soft parts of Mazon Creek organisms are typically preserved as flat, two-dimensional stains that contrast only slightly with the dark rock around them. Essentially, the first paleontologists who worked with Pohlsepia were staring at a vague smear on a rock, trying to interpret its anatomy. It’s a bit like interpreting Rorschach test drawings.

The researchers thought they were looking at a creature with a fused, sac-like head and mantle, an arm crown, symmetrical fins, and a pair of eyespots. There was no evidence of an internal or external shell. So the original team declared it a cirrate octopod—one of the deep-water octopuses. “Superficially, it looks very much like a deep water octopus,” Clements said.

But there were issues with that hypothesis.

Right off the bat, the fossil lacked features like a single row of suckers or the arm cirri—hair-like strands that line the sides of the suckers in finned octopuses. The internal shell vestige that defines cirrate octopods is also missing. The original researchers noted some cryptic light stains protruding from the main body, but they dismissed those as fluids that leaked from the carcass during burial.

The first real doubt came in 2019, when a separate research team examined the supposed eyespots of Pohlsepia. The researchers were looking for melanosomes, the melanin-synthesizing organelles that are responsible for eye pigment. Melanosomes usually preserve beautifully in other Mazon Creek fossils. But in Pohlsepia, they found nothing; the chemical signature of the spots didn’t match coleoid ocular pigments at all. This led some researchers to question the octopus interpretation.

To settle this once and for all, Clements and his team took the Pohlsepia holotype (both parts of the concretion it was found in) to the SOLEIL synchrotron facility in Paris, where they blasted it with high-energy X-ray beams.

Clements and his colleagues were looking for the exact chemical composition of the Pohlsepia fossil. “We decided to throw as many different techniques as possible at this fossil to try to work out what it was,” Clements said.

His team used a monochromatic X-ray beam that causes the different elements trapped in the rock to fluoresce, allowing researchers to build high-resolution maps of the specimen’s chemical composition. They also ran the fossil through scanning electron microscopy, micro-CT scanning, and multispectral imaging at different wavelengths to get a full picture.